Last question (I hope) I did as you said and now the sale of the car is reflected. It seems unfair that the sale of a car that had such little business usage (5% for the last few years and never more than 20%) generates "income" on 100% of the sale price, especially when in fact I passed it on as a gift. It seems logical to me that the amopunt of income the sale generates should be in direct proprtion to the the percentage that was claimed as business use. Although I haven't calculated the figure yet the fact that this sale reduced my tax refund by more than $1,000, this amount might well be greater than any previous benefit I have received?
Thanks for all your help with this